What is testing coverage in builder's risk insurance?
Testing coverage in builder’s risk insurance safeguards against damage that occurs while new building systems—like HVAC or electrical—are being tested during construction. It’s critical for projects in Colorado and Utah facing complex system start-ups or severe weather risks.
Your trusted Colorado and Utah insurance partner, providing peace of mind and clarity on advanced coverage options for growing businesses.
Complete Guide to Testing Coverage in Builder’s Risk Insurance
Why This Question Matters for Colorado and Utah Residents
Colorado and Utah construction projects face unique risks, from sudden hailstorms on the Front Range to unexpected cold snaps or power surges during new system installs. If you’re building or renovating commercial property, understanding what is (and isn’t) protected when you test new equipment is crucial.
- Disaster Risk: Hail, snowfall, and wildfire-prone conditions in Northern Colorado and Utah can cause power outages or equipment failures just as you start up HVAC or electrical systems for the first time.
- Complex Construction: New commercial builds in Denver or Salt Lake City often feature advanced electrical, mechanical, or HVAC systems that require thorough and potentially risky testing.
- High Claim Stakes: Testing failures can result in tens of thousands in equipment or building damage—builder’s risk claims in CO/UT average $15,000-$50,000 for test-phase losses, far more than typical construction wear-and-tear.
What Most People Get Wrong
Many owners and contractors assume standard builder’s risk automatically covers any damage during system commissioning, but regular policies often exclude testing-related losses without an explicit testing endorsement. Others mistake normal wear or gradual breakdown for covered damage, but insurance generally only applies to sudden, accidental failures—not routine malfunctions or improper operation.
Some believe testing coverage is only needed for “high-risk” projects, yet even simple HVAC system tests in Loveland or Park City have triggered major claims due to a faulty part or unforeseen surge.
The Complete Picture
Testing coverage is an optional endorsement for builder’s risk policies that protects your construction investment when new equipment or systems—such as HVAC, boilers, or electrical switchgear—are put through initial testing. If a covered peril (like a power surge, burst pipe from failed pressure test, or system overload) causes damage during these start-ups, testing coverage steps in to pay for repairs or replacement.
Standard builder's risk in Colorado or Utah does not automatically include coverage for testing-related incidents. You’ll need to add it if your project includes significant mechanical or electrical installations. Typical annual premiums for testing coverage run $200–$2,000 in addition to builder’s risk, depending on the scale. Wear and tear, faulty workmanship, or gradual damage remain excluded.
Making the Right Decision for Colorado and Utah Residents
Question 1: Does my project truly need builder’s risk testing coverage?
Test-phase risks vary by project, but consider these points:
- Do your plans include major HVAC, electrical, or plumbing systems requiring professional commissioning?
- Is your project in a region with frequent hail, severe cold, or fluctuating power (e.g., Denver, Fort Collins, Salt Lake City)?
Question 2: What could a testing-related loss actually cost my business?
Even a single short circuit during initial testing can destroy new equipment worth $10,000 or require schedule delays costing $25,000+ in labor and rental equipment. Reviewing past local claims, test-phase mishaps are among the most financially damaging construction losses.
Question 3: Have I selected the right coverage and documented all system tests?
To ensure smooth claims handling and regulatory compliance, retain records of commissioning protocols, certified technician reports, and before/after system photos. Colorado and Utah regulatory standards often require documented commissioning—failure to keep records may jeopardize coverage.
Trusted by Your Neighbors
Local knowledge, industry-leading protection
4.9/5 Stars
Google Reviews from real customers
97% Retention Rate
Fort Collins families and businesses protected
Independent
We work for you, not insurance companies
Local
Fort Collins owned & operated since 1992
Real World Examples
Denver: Testing Mishap, Claim Denied for Wear and Tear
Background: Tom, a commercial developer in Denver, was finishing a new office building. The mechanical crew tested the new HVAC system during a January cold snap.
Coverage: Standard builder's risk (no testing endorsement)
Monthly Premium: $275/month ($3,300/year)
The Incident: During testing, a circulation fan motor failed—damage traced to a component worn out in transit, not a sudden event.
Total Claim Cost: $9,800 (replacement motor, emergency labor, lost time)
Tom's Cost: $9,800—claim denied due to exclusion for wear and tear.
"I assumed we were covered for anything that went wrong during start-up. Turns out, testing coverage is a lot more specialized than I realized."
Fort Collins: Covered Electrical Test Failure
Background: Emily managed a mixed-use project in Old Town, Fort Collins. She added testing coverage to her builder’s risk policy on her broker’s advice.
Coverage: Builder’s risk with full testing endorsement
Monthly Premium: $340/month ($4,080/year)
The Incident: During site commissioning, a surge in the main electrical panel caused $23,000 in damage to newly installed panels and connected lighting.
Total Claim Cost: $23,000 (parts, replacements, expedited repairs)
Emily's Cost: $2,500 deductible—the rest paid by her insurance.
"If we hadn’t added testing coverage, I’d be out $20,000 and weeks behind schedule. Our FoCoIns advisor suggested the right endorsement—worth every penny."
Salt Lake City: Plumbing System Under Pressure
Background: Mark oversaw new hotel construction in downtown Salt Lake City. His team began pressure-testing the building’s plumbing before occupancy.
Coverage: Builder’s risk with added testing coverage
Monthly Premium: $400/month ($4,800/year)
The Incident: A valve failed during the pressure test, causing flooding across three floors and $38,000 in damages including drywall and flooring.
Total Claim Cost: $38,000 (material, labor, temporary pumps)
Mark's Cost: $5,000 deductible due to specialized system risk. Insurance covered the remainder.
"Testing coverage saved our opening timeline and budget. We learned just how critical it is to match coverage to every phase of construction in Utah."
Avoid These Common Mistakes
Mistake #1: Assuming Standard Builder’s Risk Covers All Testing Losses
What People Do: Many owners skip the extra premium for testing coverage, believing their builder’s risk already protects against damage from all system start-ups.
Why It Seems Logical: Testing is part of construction, so it feels like it should be covered under a basic policy.
The Real Cost: In Colorado, an overlooked testing failure (like a $20,000 HVAC loss) could be fully denied—leaving you responsible for the entire bill and any project delays. These losses are among the most expensive per incident.
Smart Alternative: Always review advanced coverage with your FoCoIns expert, especially if your project involves new equipment commissioning or complex systems. Testing coverage typically costs only a fraction more but can prevent financial disaster.
Mistake #2: Overlooking Record-Keeping Requirements for Testing Claims
What People Do: Contractors and owners may fail to keep test logs, commissioning reports, or technician certifications during system start-up.
Why It Seems Logical: Documentation may seem like a formality rather than a claim requirement, especially for small projects.
The Real Cost: Insufficient records can lead to denied claims in both Colorado and Utah, even when the event would otherwise have been covered—resulting in unreimbursed damages of $10,000–$50,000.
Smart Alternative: Adopt a rigorous record-keeping process for every system test. FoCoIns can recommend tools or checklists to simplify compliance and support smooth claims handling.
Mistake #3: Confusing Wear and Tear with Sudden Testing Failure
What People Do: File claims for equipment failures discovered during testing, not realizing some damages result from long-term deterioration or improper storage, not insurable events.
Why It Seems Logical: The failure was found during start-up, so it feels linked to the test and should be covered.
The Real Cost: Claims are denied if the adjuster determines the damage was due to existing wear, poor installation, or pre-existing flaws—common with out-of-state shipments or reused components.
Smart Alternative: Inspect and document all major system components before installation and store equipment properly. FoCoIns can guide you on steps to verify insurable, sudden, accidental damage for builder’s risk testing claims.
FAQs On The Same Topic
Find answers to your most pressing insurance questions right here.